It's the start of the new financial year and for many teams, this means alignment and planning workshops to refocus priorities and set the game plan for the year ahead.
The thinking is solid, but getting the design and execution of a workshop right is more than putting an agenda together and booking a room. Workshops are a significant time and energy investment. For example, taking 500 staff offline for 4 hours = 2000 hours = equivalent to +1 full year of an FTE and an effort investment of approximately $130k of staff time based on a department’s profile. That’s a big investment.
When done well, workshops can be valuable in fostering connection, collaboration and clarity. But to get the return on the investment, we should be thinking hard about getting the format and the design right.
Recently, we noticed a significant increase in requests to facilitate and design hybrid workshops. This can look like some people dialling in from different office locations or from home. In theory, it sounds like the best of both worlds, but in practice, many facilitators describe hybrid as the ‘least loved’ format because of the operational complexity and the persistent sense that hybrid compromises the experience of at least one participant group (State of Facilitation Report 2026). Participants don’t love this format either. The flexibility is great, but the opportunities to participate and engage as a group can feel stilted and the opportunities to contribute uneven for online colleagues.
That’s not to say there is one perfect format but depending on your workshop outcome some formats may be better than others. Below are a few pros and cons to be aware of different formats and to choose the one that works best for participants.
| All in-person | All online | Hybrid (mix of in-person and online) |
|
Pros: Easier to build genuine connection and energy in the room Consistent experience Less tech dependency Cons: Requires everyone to be in the room which may not always be possible May be higher venue and travel cost |
Pros: Logistically easier to run Consistent experience More accessible for remote or dispersed teams Cons: Harder to build the same level of genuine connection Screen fatigue Easier for participants to disengage or multitask |
Pros: Provides flexibility for people to attend in a way that best suits them Useful when teams are spread across locations Cons: Logistically challenging with more planning, resources and tech required Risk of inconsistent experience and power imbalances between in-person and online groups Requires more facilitation to keep all participants equally engaged |
It's worth remembering that you can mix your formats as well – for example, you may wish to do a fully online experience and then bring people in-person together after the session for social/casual/follow-on engagement activities in local locations if preferred.
But let's say you go with hybrid...what do you do?
We've run our fair share of hybrid sessions over the past few years and we're still learning after each one. We’ve done our thinking about how we take what we know works for in-person workshops to and how to apply this to a hybrid environment.
We follow a simple Prepare, Design and Communicate method for our workshops and have shared a few considerations that may be helpful to decide if hybrid is the right format for you, and how you can make it a great experience for your participants.
PREPARE: Start with the end in mind. What are the outcomes we want to achieve and how do we want attendees to leave feeling?
Knowing your workshop outcomes and being clear on your purpose is the first step to designing your workshop and choosing the right format.
We've created a tech checklist that you can use - download here!
DESIGN: How do we design an engaging and inclusive workshop experience to achieve the key outcomes we need?
Being aware of power imbalances is an important part of hybrid workshop design. In-person attendees or larger groups may have a louder say, and as facilitators, we try to actively call on each location or group to ensure there is equal input.
| Visual | Kinaesthetic | Auditory | Reading/writing |
|
Use images, graphs and illustrations Include outlines and agendas Show what will come and what has been presented |
Use practical activities that get people up and moving Provide materials to give people something to do with their hands Give stretch breaks |
Start and end with a brief explanation of the agenda and content Question people to draw information from them Allow time for people to make connections between learning and practical action |
Provide materials for people to read and take notes on Include individual or group brainstorming tasks |
COMMUNICATE
Communication can be a challenge at the best of times. Hybrid formats can make it difficult to check that everyone is clear on outcomes and the way forward.
Of course, nothing is foolproof and all the preparation in the world can’t stop the unexpected from happening – remember to go with the flow! Sometimes the tech may fail, or the activity doesn’t go as planned and that’s okay. A key skill is being adaptable and knowing when to pivot. From our experience, we often plan for a couple of different backup activity options if things don’t go planned.
Hybrid workshops can be challenging but with the right design, they can be engaging, inclusive and genuinely effective.